Machiavelli vs. Mohandas Gandhi-Martin Luther King Jr. on Power Essay - 1

Machiavelli vs. Mohandas Gandhi-Martin Luther King Jr. on Power - Essay ExampleThe term cause has been explicatively the most contriving subject, a deep political discourse and a philosophical thought since generations and among great thinkers of the bygone era and even of today. What exhibits a force-out within a paradigm of political intrigues and among ruling elite is a question answered by philosophers with their philosophical juxtaposition to the contemporary political situation of the era. For some philosophers, the rule by force or law justifies power governance but through abiding by the moral principles. Following the ethical principles makes the ruler rightful heir to the powers he can exert. However the term power has much more deep intensity and depth explored and applied into the consciousness of the people with great dexterity into the current political scenario. Machiavelli in his most historied treatise The Prince criticized this moral principle of authority to exp lain the power. For him there is no moral or ethical ground on the basis of which legitimate or whoreson use of power can be discussed, instead a person who is in authority has a right to command. This power position and explanation of power is contrary to the principles of Mahatma Gandhi-Martin Luther King Jr. for whom power is a means not an end in the political circle and when deep apathetic political overtures be being undertaken. The following essay will be a discussion on the Machiavellis concept against much lighter in intensity Mahatma Gandhis and Martin Luther Kings concept of power.