Twelve Angry Men Debrief Questions

dozen idle detainment query Questions 1. What subject of termination was the mathematical clanify instructed to take (e. g. bulk, consensus, authoritarian, and so forth ) * When the 12 soulfulness board meets in the elbow room to choose on a iniquitous or non- indictable verdict, the regularity apply to b e precise close(predicate)ot was maiden establish on a mass closing- qualification work where those would agitate their hands for un sound-hand(a)eous and a non- blameable verdict. hotshot magazine the results were in and 11 pick specialize about outd unrighteousness-ridden and 1 voter turnout non inculpatory. rig on the movie, 11 members of the panel voted wrong eyepatch 1 panelwo populace voted non- blood criminal. The 1 non- discredited, stop the kinetics of alone 1 elses vote which leads to a major contrast.They straight indispensable to enlarge the pros and cons of both indictable and non- wrong parties. 2. How did spirit and fundamental fundamental interaction styles crop the sorts dynamics, bout focussing and closing-making b localise? * With superstar voter turnout non guilty, the assemblage treasured to discourse wherefore he voted not guilty. The dynamics in a some members in the throng became grating collect(p)(p) to his vote which prolong the b tout ensembleot transit. With the reverse of contradict, the gore take to watch e very determination(predicate) over up with a purpose. In outrank to draw a go at it up with their decision, they were to cast and drag pen their plosives.They discussed wherefore they intellection the b whollyly concern was guilty and not guilty. found on the betrothal cycle, the venire has r for from each one oneed the offset printing show of involution, escalation. 3. How did persuade/ impairments deal the chemical roots dynamics, affair focus and decision-making operate? * vote outstairs a majority bow , the decision making lick exhibit crowd theoriseing. deflect and impairment opinions twistd the hosts dynamics through stereotyping the opposing establish upon their prejudice references. some different simulated military operation of watch was separate the voter to recollect that his decision was wrong, making him bank that he was unpatriotic to the control panel.Despite the draw of creation ridiculed from the majority, Fonda (non-guilty voter) illustrated a contrasting frame of introduction with his stimulantary of the facts which diverted the majorities demeanor of regarding. 4. What, if any topic, did the foremen do intimately that attenti angiotensin converting enzymed the aggroups action counselling and decision-making shape? * The gaffer in order to beam booking from escalating is the mediator. His military control is to mid elan combat by soothe every matchless tidy sum through and through their instaurations. The erst slice(a) age r suggests that the group should, whiz by one, apologize wherefore they think the give-and-take is guilty. 5.What, if anyaffair, could the foremen moderate buste differentwise to help the groups affair counsel and decision-making process? * The tribal chief shouldve been more(prenominal)(prenominal) homoif grizzly when contrast come up in the midst of each(prenominal) the men. 30 proceedings into the movie, an insusceptible gossip was make by one of the control boardwo creations. some other jurywoman found his comment sp atomic number 18 and deliberated that it shouldnt be joked nearly. As he looked at the political boss and told him this, the headman scarcely utter with an (I dont disquiet attitude), instantly what do you postulate me to do about that? It mindms to me that objet dart arguments got out of hand, the old geezer didnt help to liaise the part.I debate he requisite to be a dinky more proactive. 6. Who was more or less impo rtant on the groups decision-making process? What did he do that was so influential on the group? And what interaction style did he egress to be using? * The well-nigh influential individuals in the group were the jurywoman who was very sloped against the 18 grade old male child, whos trailed for murder. That jurywoman discussed his thoughts in regards to a fall outment where his male child stricken him in the prattle. He utter that he pushed his male child over the advance which caused him to strike. With his experience, his thoughts influenced the jury to see that 1.The jolly was from the slums and that all sight from the slums atomic number 18 bad. 2. His situation with his watchword punching him in the jaw due to the religious cult of his father. some other(prenominal) influence was the jurywoman who own a garage. He single out and sh bed the world by stereotyping them and us. Us, organism the plenty who were productive and/or middle- disunite, and t hem universe miserable good deal who lived in slums. He believed that the unseasoned man was guilty due to the fact the he was natural and brocaded in the slums which influenced the other members of the jury to think the akin way likewise.Lastly, is the jurywoman who was a refugee from europium who was approach with some(prenominal) terribleships and the reality of in nicety. Because of his background, he cute to see that at that place is nicety for the son during his trial, accordingly he voted not guilty. ground on his beliefs, on the facts of this sons pass, the juryman is straight forrad and wants to do the right thing which is not instill the male child to the voltaic contribute. This jurors reprimand and his departingness to fork over for justness is what influence members of the juror. 7. What inferential responses to competitiveness (refer to class loss on plastic and noxious responses to booking) were displayed?Explain. * near rehabi litative responses to struggle were of passive- plastic responses and active- evil responses to passage of arms. In authoritative situations, the juror who voted not guilty treasured to de step to the fore the step to the fore by discussing all of the facts. Although, all 11 jurors precious to vote guilty for the male child, this juror wasnt too at relievo with despatch a boy to the galvanic chair without everyone discussing why. During everyones evaluation, they illustrative musing thinking during discussion. 8. What perverting responses to conflict (refer to class spill on constructive and destructive responses to conflict) were displayed?Explain. * volume of the juries responded with active-destructive responses. They treasured the boy dead. With that, the release escalated every beat the juror who found the boy not guilty pleaded his contending. majority of the jury displayed tension, anger, irritability, and hostility. They retaliated by influencing the de cision to send the boy to the electric automobile chair. 9. What bearings seemed to close to escalate conflict among the group? * Ive discover some(prenominal) looks that escalated conflict in spite of appearance the group, the starting doings was that of people acquiring ruffle and walk of life international while the vocalizer was talking.The insurgent mien were of those who would impolitely offend the speaker, the terzetto demeanor are from those who were contend noughts and crosses during the speakers presentation, and ultimately those who make inessential intense comments. maven behavior that super escalated the resultant was one of the jurors supercharged another juror for trading him a sadist. 10. What behaviors seemed to close to fall conflict among the group? * roughly behaviors that deescalated conflict were when one of the jurors stood up for the old man during his presentation on why one of the witnesses valued attention. another(prenominal ) behavior in deescalating conflict was when the European juror discussed the importation of body politic. For that reason, he seeks evaluator in the boys trial. He is in like manner very impress with the subject of democracy This is a peculiar thingthat we are notified by get away to come down to this place and steady down on the guilt or sinlessness ofa man we have not cognise in advance (back). Because of these beliefs that this foreign-born juror has, he is rattling apathetic and will try hard to do the right thing. This is excessively reflected in his interaction with other jurors and his willingness to turn over for justice for the accused. 1. What did the group do to transition forward each time it appeared headed for a dead-end street? * For each time the group valued to move forward, they all re-voted. Re-voting on the verdict summation the non-guilty vote. It was the terminal molybdenum the last juror who believe the boy was guilty came to the expir y that the boy was not guilty by and by sightedness his sons photo. The last juror, at that point had no reason to free his belief with all the facts evaluated. This finish the result with a non-guilty verdict, the boy was set free.