AUTOETHNOGRAPHY AS A METHOD FOR REFLEXIVE RESEARCH Essay

AUTOETHNOGRAPHY AS A METHOD FOR REFLEXIVE RESEARCH - rise Examplelentlessly attempted to overcome the divide between academic noesis (so called cultivated knowledge) and popular knowledge (so called uncultivated knowledge).In the poststructuralist paradigm, different streams have emerged such as rhetoric abbreviation, discursive analysis, ethnomethodology, content analysis and so on in order to comprehend the phenomena under consideration from unconventional planes and levels. Autoethnography too is a poststructuralist approach, which is used mainly for dealing with issues related to self and identity. It is a genre in the making in both academic as well as real life practices. Autoethnography is at present an open up approach in a number social science fields such as anthropology, sociology and heathen studies (Anderson, 2006 Etherington, 2004 Roth, 2005). In essence, narrative analysis is what constitutes autoethnography as an independent social science approach. Moreover, aut oethnography is broadly multidisciplinary as it synthesises umteen suppositious tolls from a number of paradigms. According to autoethnographic approach, one could cultivate knowledge or open up a new level of discourse or invent a new plane of theoretical activity through the medium of a personalised style of writing. Here, the personalised style of writing would fundamentally be linked to or based on established scientific theory. Being part of the postmodern tradition of knowledge-making, autoethnography rejects the prevalent scienticism in almost all the branches of human knowledge (Wall, 2006). On the other hand, theorists of variant hues still see autoethnography as deprived of scientific rigour, methodological validity and epistemological legitimacy. Countering this, the proponents of autoethnography assert that censorious practices which are established in social science for validating knowledge could also be replicated to autoethnography in order to check its legitimac y and accuracy. In reality, the difference of opinion on the matter of